logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.05.11 2017고정1451
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling food, such as cutting down and salted fish, and the defendant A is the factory site of the corporation B.

1. No indication or advertisement of the nutritional value of Defendant A's food is different from facts or exaggerated with respect to the raw materials, ingredients, and uses thereof;

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) from January 23, 2015 to January 29, 2015; (b) from April 3, 2015 to July 8, 2015; (c) from October 20, 2015 to September 28, 2016; and (d) from September 20, 2015 to September 28, 2016, the Defendant manufactured “E” products manufactured by the said company with name cut [50% domestic name [80-85%) as raw materials; (b) even if the name manufactured “50% (90%) by indicating that the name was cut [50%) of the raw materials, it is different from the fact from the fact, and (d) indicating that the name was cut off [50%) as indicated in attached Table I].

314,453 Total amounting to KRW 786,130,000,000, fakes 500g

The total market value of 35,760,000 won was manufactured and sold.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, committed the same offense as in the preceding paragraph against Defendant A, who is an employee of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Each investigation report (in the note), each of which shall be reported (with respect to the result of importing foreign products, the result of importing foreign trees, the records of importing foreign trees, and the relation with the storage and use by B by the person who holds the dispute resolution committee);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a copy of the item manufacturing report;

1. Defendant A: Article 95 subparag. 1 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 13(1) subparag. 2 of the Food Sanitation Act (Selection of a punishment penalty): Defendant B: Articles 100, 95 subparag. 1 and 13(1)2 of the Food Sanitation Act;

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;

arrow