1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The grounds for the judgment of this court partially citing the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “The developments leading to the disposition of this case” and “the lawfulness of the disposition of this case

(a)a summary of the Parties’ assertion;

B. Relevant statutes are the same as stated in the pertinent part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (from No. 2 to No. 3, No. 14, and No. 9 to 11). As such, the part that differs from the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. 2. 1) Whether a higher administrative agency’s determination of functional disorder not with inspection opinion is essential or not in determining whether a higher administrative agency’s performance guidelines or interpretation and application of statutes is effective only within an administrative organization, but it does not have external binding power. However, if a provision of statutes provides for a certain administrative agency with authority to determine the specific contents of statutes and does not specify the procedure or method of exercising such authority in the form of administrative rules, such administrative rules are combined with those of a lower administrative agency with the authority of a lower administrative agency to supplement the pertinent statutory provisions beyond the general binding force of the Act and subordinate statutes. 207.

(xc)"assign."