The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 2, 2016, the Defendant concluded the instant contract for construction works (hereinafter “instant contract”). On or around December 14, 2016, the Plaintiff and the contracting number C agreed to KRW 140,845,620 with respect to the instant construction works (hereinafter “DD”) and concluded the instant contract. Around December 14, 2016, the Plaintiff reported to the Defendant’s branch office that it applied the human resources non-snick beam method in order to prevent civil petitions arising from frequent vehicle traffic. On January 2, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the difference between the construction cost of KRW 140,845,620 and KRW 463,700 with respect to the instant construction works, and the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the difference between the Plaintiff and the construction cost of KRW 140,83,000 with respect to the instant construction work and the construction cost of KRW 20,000,000,0000.

‘The notarial deeds of the notarial deed of debt repayment(pre-loan) contract are the notarial deed of this case prepared by Law Firm B No. 400, 2018, hereinafter ‘the notarial deed'.

-Prepared. [The facts that there is no dispute over the basis for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2;