A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] The Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. in the Jeonju District Court’s branch on August 9, 2018, and written indictment in the case of 2020 Gohap14 on June 25, 2019 as “the June 15, 2019.” However, according to the “the status of individual confinement” attached to the investigation report (suspect A’s repeated crime and confirmation), the Defendant appears to have written an error as “the June 25, 2019.”

The execution of the sentence was completed.

【Criminal Facts】

"2020 Gohap14"

1. On February 16, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Duplicative Intimidation, etc.) committed the crime of spiting the victim’s face, etc. on the following grounds: (a) around 18:30 on February 16, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year from the crime of interference with business, etc. in the above regular support, and sentenced the victim to imprisonment with prison labor for one year on August 9, 2018 on the crime of spiting the victim’s face.

No person shall make a intimidation for the purpose of retaliation against the provision of a criminal investigation force, such as a criminal complaint or accusation, statement, testimony or submission of data, in connection with the investigation or trial of his/her or another person's criminal case.

Nevertheless, at around 01:00 on April 28, 2020, the Defendant: (a) found the E-state store operated by the victim in the area D located in the area D located in the area B of the Jeonbuk-gun, North Korea, and threatened the victim with the victim “I ambling or I ambling. I am well drinking. I will do so.”

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim with the purpose of retaliation against the provision of proviso of investigation and statement in relation to the investigation of his criminal case.

2. In the time and place described in paragraph 1, the Defendant was threatened with the above B, as described in paragraph 1, the victim G (Nam, 39 years of age) operating a cafeteria at the next building of the above B, would not see why the victim G (Nam, and 39 years of age) would be “dysia.”