beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around August 201, the Defendant came to know of the Victim F (the 37 years of age) through E, which was a relationship with the victim, and, “E is a business partnership but is not a relationship with the victim. It is the same as the business that is being used in mind, and thus, has a good relationship to continue to be on the premise of marriage in the future.” The Defendant saw the victim as having a harsh relationship with the victim to obtain money by deceiving the victim through the ice of marriage.
Defendant,
1. On September 19, 201, the following facts are false: (a) the victim made a false statement by telephone stating that “I will borrow money in short of the funds to start a good e-mail business; (b) I will pay the principal and profits as profits accrued; (c) I will get the victim from the victim; and (d) from September 19, 201 to December 7, 201, the victim received total of KRW 66 million from September 19, 201 to December 7, 201, from the Defendant and Defendant G’s account, etc. under the name of G;
2. On February 2012, the following year: (a) on the basis of a false statement stating that “If a person obtains bonds to purchase goods and make a business, or receives loans from the fourth financial right and then send them to China, he/she may pay to the victim KRW 1 to 20 million per month from the following month; (b) he/she borrowed money from several lending companies in exchange for money from the victim who borrowed money from several lending companies, as described in attached Table 5 to 15, as shown in attached Table 15, even if he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the money, even if he/she borrowed money due to the lack of personal debt repayment or living expenses.”
7. up to 9.9. received a total of KRW 51.8 million from Defendant G’s account in the name of Defendant G;
3. The fact in the French land around August 2012 is that the victim had no intention to purchase the apartment, and the victim has to prepare the apartment house and the apartment house in Jeju-do along with children.