logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.10.16 2013고단3799
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 3799"

1. At around 14:30 on May 1, 2013, the Defendant discovered that the text of the DSS7 vehicle owned by the injured party C was not corrected in front of the Dong-dong, Cheongju-dong, Busan, Busan, the Cheongdong-dong, the Cheongdong-dong, the Cheongdong-dong, the Busan, the Busan, and found that the text of the DM7 vehicle owned by the injured party was not corrected, opened a door to the driver’s seat, and cut off one half wall containing 600,000 won in cash owned by the injured party on the middle corner of the front seat.

"2013 Highest 3960"

2. At around 14:00 on June 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a front door of the HLIS car that was parked in the FIS parking lot located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was not corrected by the Victim G; and (b) took a theft of the total of two parts, such as one copy of the New World Geographic Point Point Card and one copy of the TIS World Card.

3.(a)

On June 23, 2013, at around 17:34, 2013, the Defendant purchased two gold bars equivalent to KRW 784,800 of the market value, which is the victim’s possession, at the “K” precious metal store operated by the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government International Award No. 51, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount by presenting the stolen global card to the victim as if it were one’s own card and allowing the victim to pay the price by means of the said credit card.

B. On June 23, 2013, at around 17:42, the Defendant purchased clothes of 45,000 won or more at the market price, which is the victim’s ownership, at the “N” store operated by the victim M of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City L award No. 24, and acquired financial benefits equivalent to the same amount by presenting the name-free store card as if it was one’s card, and allowing the said employee to pay the price by means of the said credit card.

4. The Defendant, as described in paragraph (2), was stolen using the credit card in the name of G for a total of twice as described in paragraph (3).

arrow