The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is recognized as a favorable sentencing factor or sentencing factor to be considered objectively, neutral, such as the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case, the amount of damage of this case is not significant, the defendant has no record of the same kind of crime, the defendant supported the defendant with the disease, and the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case. In the trial, the defendant is recognized as a favorable sentencing factor to consider that the victim does not want punishment against the defendant by mutual consent with the victim.

However, in 199, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence in 8 months of imprisonment due to theft, etc., and sentenced to two years of suspended sentence in 2008 due to violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Fraud, etc., and sentenced to ten times of imprisonment in 10 months of imprisonment. The Defendant’s crime of this case recognized by evidence, evidence, rules of evidence, and legal principles also recognized that the Defendant committed the crime of this case, which committed the crime of this case, committed the crime of taking the excessive (10cm in knife length) of the female employees of convenience points who are mixed with the victim’s chest over the victim’s chest while threatening the victim to take property by threatening the victim’s chest and threatening the victim’s chest, and the victim appears to have undergone considerable mental impulse, and the victim is also deemed to have undergone considerable mental impulse or objective and neutral sentencing factors.

The above sentencing factors and the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime of this case, motive and background of the crime of this case, the means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime of this case, even though the court below did not want the punishment of the defendant under the agreement with the victim, the crime of this case was committed by imprisonment with prison labor for life or for a limited term of not less than five years, and thus, the court below, which was conducted as a participatory trial, has