A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a person who worked as a salesperson at the Da branch located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si from May 2, 2010 to February 2, 2012.

1. The Defendant is a person who, from May 2010 to February 2, 2012, works as a sales salesperson at a business office located in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, as a sales salesperson and has been engaged in the automobile sales business.

On August 16, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim D to sell SM5 vehicles at the above C business office, and then embezzled a total of seven million won for personal consumption, including being paid 18 million won for the vehicle from the victim on August 23, 2011 and used 4.5 million won on the same day during the storage of the victim for the victim.

2. Fraud;

A. Around October 2011, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim E with a false statement to the victim E that “a vehicle is transferred in advance with a vehicle delivery fee of KRW 1,3250,000,000,000, and a vehicle is delivered on the face of the main page.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to deliver the vehicle even if he received the money from the victim, because he wishes to use the money for personal debt repayment.

Around October 8, 2011, the Defendant received 1,3250,000 won from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant.

B. Around January 27, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim H by telephone, stating that “A customer who intends to purchase SS7 new vehicles” would sell the 2008-type white white cryp vehicle, which the customer was on board, to 17.5 million won, and deliver it to the 17.5 million won in exchange with a new vehicle, and first of all, the Defendant deposited 7.5 million won as a down payment.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to deliver the vehicle even if he received the money from the victim, because he thought that he will use the money for personal debt repayment.

On the same day, the defendant received 7.5 million won from the victim's account in the name of the defendant.

(c).