All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On March 4, 2016, around 10:30 on March 4, 2016, the Defendant insultd the victim E, who was in a relationship with the Defendant, on the ground that the victim E, who was in a relationship with the Defendant, was not subject to the Defendant’s telephone, is not subject to the Defendant’s “dial phone.”

Chewing without permission, Chewing, and mael are not recklessly given. Eargue typ typ gue.

Body board, gyms.

(1) The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to a large amount of Chewing year.

B. (1) The Defendant’s intimidation (1) on March 28, 2016, on the ground that the victim E, while under the influence of alcohol in Gwangju Seo-gu G on March 28, 2016, intends to take the victim’s phone without receiving the Defendant’s telephone.

(z) The same opening;

1. Domination of tax base: Domination of tax base;

The seedlings of Possia are boomed by the birth of her natives.

A person who is likely to be a scarg and scarg in the Republic of Korea shall be discarded in the Republic of Korea.

The term “the victim’s family member was frightened to talk about the fact that the Defendant and the victim were in a resistant relationship, thereby threatening the victim.

(2) On April 10, 2016, the Defendant called the victim E’s house at the victim’s house at the end of Gwangju (A.M.) around April 10, 2016, and calls the victim for “the victim will talk about the victim’s me about the mester.”

Driving away from the house of a r.

In other words, “the victim’s husband made a threat to the victim by giving the victim a heavy amount of credit card payment as long as the victim’s husband would have a substantial amount of the unpaid card payment.”

(3) On April 2016, the Defendant had the victim’s phone number for the reason that the victim E attempts to take the vehicle within the Defendant’s vehicle parked in the P.S. P. P. P. in the P.S. P. on the date of 2016, without having the Defendant’s telephone.

Republic of Korea is a large number of years;

That means that it is.

It shall not be clateral test.

The phrase “the victim’s family member is the victim’s relationship with the Defendant and the victim.”