logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.10.31 2011구합30038
부당이득금환수고지처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s restitution notification disposition of KRW 5,162,640 against Plaintiff A on June 2, 201, and the Plaintiff on June 20, 2011.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. (1) On February 27, 2010, Plaintiff A was involved in an accident that causes the body of Plaintiff A while using a flag feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld furd feld f.

Plaintiff

A was determined as Grade 12 No. 9 of the disability grade according to the opinions of advisory opinions by the Defendant and received disability benefits of KRW 7,227,680.

B.1) On June 29, 2010 at the construction site of G, Plaintiff B was involved in an accident where H-type lectures were used by selling, etc. to perform the preparation work for the installation of a steel frame at the construction site of G. B. (2) On June 29, 2010, Plaintiff B entered into the fluora hospital with dry fluoral dysium, variable dysium, and daily dysium (I), and on October 21, 2010, Plaintiff B entered the fluoral dysium (I): (i) on the left-hand part; (ii) on the left-hand part; (iii) on the left-hand part; (iv) on the left-hand part; (v) on the left-hand part; (v) on the left-hand part; (v) on the left-hand part; (v) on the surface of 35∑ 10·25·251·2601·251·271·651·27 degree of disability.

Plaintiff

B With respect to the opinion of advisory opinions on the defendant's affiliation, disability benefits are determined as Grade 14 No. 10 and disability benefits 6,02.

arrow