The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant was aware of the crime of this case and the defendant was repented of the mistake, and that the degree of damage to the crime of this case was not significant.

However, the court below seems to have determined a punishment by fully considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and it seems that there is no change of circumstances that could change the situation between the court below and the punishment. The crime of this case is committed by forging documents or signatures under the name of another person in order to prevent the defendant from driving under the influence of alcohol or injuring, and to escape criminal punishment. The crime of this case is very bad, and the defendant has committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period; the defendant has been sentenced several times of punishment due to the same crime; the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period; the punishment is limited to imprisonment with prison labor as to the crime of forging a signature and the crime of uttering of a false signature, the crime of uttering of a false signature and the crime of uttering of a false signature, and other various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, such as the age, character and environment of the defendant, the circumstances before and after

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, among the facts of the crime in paragraph (5) of the judgment below, the "paragraph (1)" shall be deemed to be "paragraph (4)", and the "paragraph (2)" in paragraph (6) shall be corrected to "paragraph (5)", respectively.