logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.07 2016가합559518
추심금
Text

1. The part concerning the creditor subrogation claim among the lawsuit in this case shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim for collection of money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Claim, etc. 1) The Plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) against the Plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”)

2) The Plaintiff, etc., who was a member of the C Cooperatives, was a company established for the purpose of mutual aid consignment business. (2) As such, D and other officers and employees of the C Cooperatives, including D, who were the head of the C Cooperatives, have pretended to sell goods and other items to many unspecified people, and, if so, would be able to obtain enormous profits through dividends, if they would make payments for sales of goods such as contributions and subscription for events. The Plaintiff, etc., joined the C Cooperatives and paid money in the name of investments and the price of goods.

3) On March 10, 2016, the Plaintiff et al. filed an application for a payment order seeking payment of KRW 2,498,557,982, after deducting the total amount of KRW 2,508,718 from the total amount of KRW 5,006,976,70 paid by the Plaintiff et al. to the C Union as Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016 tea1086, March 10, 2016; and the said court filed an application for a payment order seeking payment of KRW 2,498,57,982 from the total amount of KRW 5,508,718 paid by the Plaintiff et al. to the C Union for the purpose of investment, goods cost, etc. (hereinafter “instant payment order”). On March 25, 2016, the said court shall pay the Plaintiff et al. (attached Form 2] written in the table collection claim column

(2) On April 30, 2016, the instant payment order was issued, and the instant payment order became final and conclusive ( Accordingly, the claim against the Plaintiff et al. against C is referred to as the “instant payment order bond”).

B. B. B. C., SP Information and Communications Co., Ltd. and the Defendant are the following: “Where a customer purchases goods or receives services from a credit card merchant and pays the payment by credit card, etc., the Defendant shall pay the remainder after receiving the payment from the credit card company, etc. to the franchise store.”

arrow