logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.01.06 2015고정661
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, jointly with C on December 14, 2014 from around 20:45 to 21:02 the same day, while drinking alcohol at a cafeteria operated by the victim E (52 tax) on the first floor underground of the D Building in Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City D (52) from around 20:45 on December 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) carried the alcohol with C; (b) made the said customers who are able to boom with other tablers, with the view to booming, “hing off the flus, flus, and flusing the flus, and flusing the flus, flusing the flus, flus, and flusing the brus.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with C interfered with the victim's operation of the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, and C;

1. Application of field photographs [In accordance with the evidence duly admitted by this Court, it is recognized that the Defendant, who is the person against whom the disturbance was raised, is in combination with C and was able to take a bath and take a dust as stated in its reasoning] shall apply to the field photographs (the evidence duly admitted by this Court is acknowledged as follows).

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is decided as above on the ground that Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (a) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (a) states that the Defendant denies the crime, but considering the circumstances in which the degree of the fence is relatively minor and the circumstances in which the Defendant endeavored to recover damage therefrom, it seems that the amount of the fine specified in the summary order would be somewhat excessive) is higher than that of the said Act.

arrow