The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The fact that E serves as the chairperson of the Dong building of the apartment of this case and received total of KRW 3,600,000 from the apartment management company related to the apartment of this case is true.

However, if the representative of the Dong without any explanation indicates that he received money from the apartment management company during his term of office, the general residents received unjust money for personal use.

In light of the fact that the document of this case is false and the fact that H used money for a private purpose is well known that H used money for a private purpose, and that the Defendant and his accomplice was well aware of the fact that E used money for the future tourism of the occupants of the apartment complex, the Defendant can recognize the fact that the document of this case was distributed for the purpose of slandering, recognizing that it was false.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

2. Determination

A. When the Defendant, C, and D came to know of the fact that the victim E runs in the same election of the F apartment unit in Gwangju City, the Defendant and C, and D conspired to distribute printed matter with false facts about the victim to the apartment mail in order to prevent the same from being elected to the same representative.

이에 따라, 피고인과 C, D은 2015. 4. 11. 오후 경 광주시 F 아파트 마을회관에서 G으로 하여금 그 곳에 있는 컴퓨터를 이용하여 ‘ 주민께 올리는 글’ 이라는 제목으로 “1. 존경하는 105동 5, 6, 7, 8 라인과 104동 1, 2, 3 라인 주민 여러분!! 금번 제 10기 동대표로 출마는 H 씨는 8년 간의 부녀회장 재임시 약 7년 동안 총 7천만 원 상당의 광고료, 장사 및 기타 기부금을 사용하면서 단 한 장의 관련 증빙서 및 영수증을 개인이 갖고 있으면서 관리사무소에 제출하지 않고 마치 사적인 돈인 냥 사용하여 관리소장 및 제 9 기...