A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who entered the Republic of Korea around July 6, 201, entered the Republic of Korea, and worked as a park from the textile company in the mutual incompeti-dong, Hong-dong, Yangju-si, Yangju-si.

In fact, even if the defendant was to have been employed in the Republic of Korea and paid money, he believed that he had been invited for business purposes as related to domestic companies, and had been issued a visa, and had been willing to work after entering the Republic of Korea.

On June 11, 201, the Defendant issued a false invitation letter to C and D to the effect that, for the false invitation letter necessary for visa issuance, US$ 4,00 to C and D, the Defendant: (a) requested C and D residing in Korea to create a false invitation letter of domestic company to issue the Defendant’s business visa; (b) E (E) made a false invitation letter to issue the Defendant’s business visa; and (c) made E (E) in order with the Defendant issued a false invitation letter to the Defendant by the G operating company F; and (d) made a false invitation letter to the Defendant at the Embassy of the Republic of Korea Embassy in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the purpose of issuing the visa, at the Embassy of the Republic of Korea, “F and D, located in Mapo-gu, Seoul; (b) proposed to issue the visa; and (c) submitted the false invitation letter and the application document to a public official who is not aware of the fact that the visa was completely prepared; and (d) refused the visa from the above public official on March 121, 21, Incheon.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C, D, and E in sequence, and applied for visa issuance by a public official in charge of visa issuance affairs belonging to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea, who belongs to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea, by fraudulent means, at the same time as he interferes with legitimate execution of duties concerning visa issuance affairs

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Each police statement with regard to G and I.