A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 24, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court, and a summary order of five million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving on June 28, 2010) from the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 23:00 on November 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven a CK5 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of about 0.141% from about 4 KK to the front road of the Han River Dog-gu, U.S. Sinsan Pung-dong, the city bus terminal located in the Pyeong-dong, Seosan-si, Kim Jong-gu, to the river in front of the Han River Dog-gu, Seog-gu.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving CK5 cars.

On November 25, 2012, at around 23:00, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol and proceeded at a speed below the speed of speed in the city, depending on the two-lanes in the direction of the Yancheon Tri-do in the direction of the Yancheon-dong in the Yancheon-si in the Yansan-si.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly manipulate the steering gear of the motor vehicle and prevent the accident by thoroughly manipulating the steering gear of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and negligently operated the steering system under the influence of alcohol, and caused the collision between the two sides of the EDap car driven in the same direction and the two-lanes of the EDap car driven in the same direction, and the two-lanes of the Dap car were tight to the upper left side of the above K5 car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F.F. (54) who was accompanied by the said multilateral car due to the foregoing occupational negligence, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F. (54).