logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.03 2015나67153
건물인도등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) additional evidence submitted by the court of first instance that is insufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion; (b) each statement of evidence No. 12-14 is rejected; and (c) part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases; and (d) it is acceptable

In the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part "83 stores" in the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as "83 stores, as shown in the attached Form 3."

In the third page of the judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “the part indicated as 156 among the drawings of the attached Form 2 (hereinafter “instant store”)” shall be read as “the part indicated as 156 among the drawings of the attached Form 2 (Provided, That the above part possessed by the Defendants shall not be accurately consistent with the location of 156 through 156 of the sectional ownership register of the instant building; hereinafter “instant store”).”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow