logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.14 2017고단8247
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who actually operates C, D, and E, a business that raises breast, graphite, etc. and sells melting, etc. in the wife population B, in response to the facts charged.

Defendant 1 purchased melting from the above C through the publicity hall located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, Daegu-si, etc., in order to make it difficult for customers to understand the difference in actual content of melting or the ensuing satching in the process of carrying out the process of carrying out the melting by using the monthly clinical facilities installed in the above D, Defendant 1: (a) purchased melting customers who purchased melting melting 1/3 of melting 1/3 of melting melting melting melting 1/3 of melting melting melt purchased by customers; and (b) purchased melting melting melting melting melting 1/3 of melting melting melting melting 1/3 of melting melting melt purchased by customers in the above D; or (c) ordered customers who are their family members and interest employees of C to deduct 1/3 of melting melting 2/3 of melting melting m.

Around February 26, 2013, the Defendant received “monthly request” from the victim F to June 11, 2013, with regard to the melting for the 202 times in Yangsan City, and received as above, the Defendant, even if he manufactured the melting mal of Green Month by using the whole mar for the melting mar that he purchased by the victim, deceiving the victim as if he manufactured the mar for the marization of Green Month using the whole mar that he purchased by the victim, and received KRW 1,450,00 from the victim as well as from the time when he received the delivery of KRW 1,450,00 from the victim for the marging expenses for the marization and the marging period. In addition, from June 11, 2013, the Defendant deceiving the same victims by means of total 202 times in total as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Form 200,000 won.

2. One copy of the USB submitted by the Prosecutor to determine the admissibility of evidence (this image.

arrow