The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant led to the crime of this case, the defendant's profits acquired by the crime of this case are not significant, and there are family members in need of support, it seems that the court below also determined the punishment in consideration of all the above sentencing factors.

In this situation, the crime of this case is that the defendant took part in the collection and delivery of cash from 150 million won by acquiring money from 150 million won in total from 150 million won from the victim in light of the method and contents of the crime. The crime of Bosing is very poor in light of the method and contents of the crime. The scope of damage is hard to regulate because the crime of Bosing is close and planned, and the scope of damage is not differentiated and is not easy to recover from damage, and its social harm is very high, so it is necessary to punish the crime of this case. The defendant enters the Republic of Korea to take part in the crime of Bosing with the promise of 200,00 won daily promise and take part in the crime of Bosing, the damage of the victims is not recovered, and the defendant's age, career, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the punishment of the judgment below is too unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.