The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The text of the grounds for appeal posted by the defendant does not contain any expression that may undermine people's social evaluation;

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the offense of insult, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Summary of the facts charged in this case and the judgment of the court below

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the human rights movement was known as a knowledge of the advancement of interest.

F. F. F. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. “DS relation (which means dividing the role into a main and old class)” on September 2012, F. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H.

It was sexual harassment, such as sending a message to the fourth generation of the right to the right.

Accordingly, on March 21, 2013, the victims were no longer present, and the F knew of F's sexual harassment on the new wall twitter, and F immediately posted an apology and writing on the Twitter.

The Defendant, via Twitter, considered the above F’s apology and writing on March 21, 2013, followed by his dwelling in Gangnam-gu Seoul, G and 115 Dong 605 on March 21, 2013, in his Twitter’s account (H).

The new wall is the tweet of the female tweet. There is no doubt to criticize the new wall.

Dr. It is a kind of dr. However, it will be helpful to raise the atmosphere between two persons.

Cleared f. W. F. W. W. G.W. Mada f.W.

After posting the letter "," the victim 1 to 6 out of the comments posted on his own account, the victim sawed the following 1 to 6 languages, and the victim extracted 7,8 out of the dialogue between the other Twitter and the other Twitter.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

- - Aro -

1. Letters posted on February 27, 2013.