1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties against the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. D's clans (EMs; hereinafter referred to as the "family clans of this case") consisting of descendants of the FF clan E, and are in the clans established for the purpose of protecting the relics and seedlings of the clans and enhancing the friendship among the members of the clans, and all the plaintiffs (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Plaintiffs"), the designated parties, and the designated parties (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "appointed parties"), and the defendants are the members of the above clans.

B. Among the plaintiffs and the defendants' joint shipbuilding, eight graves for lineal and lineal common vessels after G including G (hereinafter referred to as "the grave of this case," each of the above graves was installed near H in Kimhae-si, but its specific location is as follows.

According to the evidence A No. 11, although it is stated that the graves of the parties to this case exist in Kimhae-si, the plaintiffs and the defendants jointly indicate the location where the graves of the joint ancestor are installed as shown below, and arranged accordingly.

Serial Name 1 G Kimhae-si 1 G Kimhae-si 1 G Kimhae-si 2 JC Kimhae-si 3 L Kimhae-si 4 NC Kimhae-si 5 P P 5 P in QC Kim Jong-si 5 P 7 UC Kimhae-si 5 M 8 X Kimhae-si Y

C. Around April 2015, the Defendants, without the resolution of the instant clan, laid off the remains of the deceased by using three persons of the body of the two days, inserting the soil of each of the instant graves by inserting the body of the body of the deceased. D. The Defendants excavated the remains of the deceased.

The plaintiffs above C.

Although a criminal complaint was filed against the Defendants to the effect that the act of a demurrer constitutes the crime of excavating a grave, the prosecutor of the original district prosecutor's office affiliated with the original district prosecutor's office rendered a non-prosecution disposition on June 26, 2019 against the Defendants.

(No. 12176). [Grounds for recognition] of the original district public prosecutor’s office in 2019, entry of Gap, 3 through 11, 29, Eul evidence No. 15 through 19 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. The clan of this case is the Franm E.