1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendants are the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C(D).

1. In principle, service by delivery, as a matter of principle, of documents, on the person to be served at his domicile, residence, business office, or office, of the person to be served (Articles 178(1) and 183(1) of the Civil Procedure Act) may be based on a supplementary service, which is delivered by the delivery agency to the person to be served at the domicile, residence, business office, or office of the person to be served (Articles 178(1) and 183(1) of the Civil Procedure Act). If the delivery agency fails to

(Article 186(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. On the other hand, “a person living together” under Article 186(1) of the Civil Procedure Act refers to a person who actually belongs to the same household as the person to be served and lives together.

(2) On June 12, 2008, the court of first instance sent a copy of the complaint of this case to Defendant A on June 12, 2008, under the records of this case (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Da44730, Oct. 11, 2012). The court of first instance, on June 12, 2008, sent a copy of the complaint of this case to Defendant A on June 17, 2008, under Dong-gu Incheon Building 2, Dong-gu, Incheon, where Defendant A’s domicile is Defendant A’s private village resident, and received it as “Dong Dong-gu,” the court of first instance again sent a copy of complaint of this case to Defendant A on July 17, 2008, but did not serve as an unidentified address. The court of first instance ordered Defendant A to serve a written order for public notice on July 31, 2008, the date of pleading, notice, the original copy of the complaint, etc.

Meanwhile, comprehensively taking account of the purport of evidence Nos. 5 through 7 of this case’s statement, it is recognized that Defendant A did not reside in the actual above house at the time of sending a copy of the complaint of this case, and that Defendant A received a copy of the complaint of this case according to the above facts, F, who received the copy of the complaint of this case.