1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts of recognition are the same as the part of “1. Basic Facts” to “1. Basic Facts” to “3, 5, i.e., Part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases of writing or adding some parts as follows. Thus, they shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

[Supplementary or added parts] Under the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the construction of the 4th and 5th "construction of the wastewater pipeline (hereinafter "construction of the wastewater pipeline of this case")" was "construction of the 2nd part of the judgment of the court of first instance," and the construction of the 2nd part of the 2nd part below "construction of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 4th judgment," "construction of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part as "construction of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part," respectively.

The following shall be added to the third page of the judgment of the first instance.

【E. The Plaintiff is a D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) around January 2017.

2) The CCTV image survey (hereinafter “the CCTV video survey”) was requested to examine the defects of the conduits of this case. Accordingly, D is required to examine the CCTV images of this case.

) and air pressure test (hereinafter referred to as “instant air pressure test”)

(2) The CCTV video data (hereinafter “the CCTV video data of this case”) was conducted and the result of the investigation found that the CCTV video data of this case was damaged, rupture, rupture, and protruding to the pipe of this case.

(2) The CCTV survey report and the air pressure test report (hereinafter “the air pressure test report of this case”)

(f) The Plaintiff submitted the documents, etc.. The Plaintiff performed the repair work of the instant conduit and completed the construction work. On the third page of the first instance judgment, “Evidence A(A) and Nos. 8 and 9” were added following the “Evidence A(A) and No. 4.”

2. Determination

A. The judgment on the cause of the claim is replaced by the defect repair of the instant conduit in accordance with Article 667 of the Civil Act, as a person who performed the instant pipeline construction by being awarded a contract.