Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three months.
The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 16, 2015, the Defendant concluded that, at the clothing store operated by the Defendant in the subway C Co., Ltd., Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant “I will pay the interest and principal without compensation within three months if I lend money to the Defendant who is an employee.”
However, as the defendant was unable to pay the money for clothes in excess of his/her obligation, there was no intention or ability to pay the money for the borrowed money to the victim.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received KRW 7 million from the injured party to the one bank account (E) in the name of the same day on the same day, and received KRW 2,167,00,000 from around that time to May 17, 2015, in total, six times as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Form D from around that time.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;
1. Application of the police statement protocol law to B
1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;
1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 32 (1) 3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuit for Dismissal of Application for Compensation (the scope of liability for compensation is not clear as it has been partially repaid) shall be determined as ordered by the order, taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant, who had worked as his employee at the time of the occurrence of the crime, shall acquire 2,1670,000 won in total under the name of the borrowed money six times against the victim; (b) the contact is discontinued in light of the content of the crime, the amount of fraud, and the circumstances after the crime; (c) only part of the principal is repaid; (d) the Defendant has not recovered from the principal; and (e) the Defendant had the history of punishment for the same kind of crime before the instant case; and