1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a holder of the vehicle B. A.I. car.

Defendant did not subscribe to mandatory insurance with respect to the said car;

1. On January 30, 2014, around 04:27, on the road of the high-sea high-speed high-speed high-speed high-speed high-speed, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si:

2. On March 15, 2014 01:04 at Yangju-si, South-dong, South-dong, and three village entrance districts:

3. On April 26, 2014, 03:53, from the Hayang-dong Hayang-dong Masan-dong, Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu:

4. On May 28, 2014, 06:14 at the distance in front of the Gyeonggi-do Gyeonggi-do, Namyang-si around 06:14:

5. From 00:06 to 00:10,00 on August 18, 2014 to 00:10, the distance of the education from the education from the education from the education from the education from the education from the education from the education from the education from the education from the education from the North

6. On September 11, 2014, in front of filling 306, Yongsan-dong 306, Yongsan-do, the Government around 17:15:

7. From Sep. 13, 2014 to Sep. 22:19 to Feb. 22:2, 2014, the agricultural product collection center in the Yangju-si, Yangju-si;

8. At around 01:50 on October 15, 2014, in front of the private labor in the Guri-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City:

9. On November 1, 2014, around 04:56, the two cities operated each of the above automobiles, or made C operate it, in front of the Agricultural Cooperatives for the purpose of profit-making in both cities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inquiry into the history of the mandatory insurance contract;

1. An inquiry into non-insurance operation vehicle (the defendant himself/herself is the owner of a motor vehicle because he/she kept the said motor vehicle for the bond security. However, as long as the defendant has obtained permission for operation during the custody of the owner, the defendant constitutes a motor vehicle owner under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2004Do1018, Apr. 23, 2004).

1. Relevant Articles 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015) concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and the proviso of Article 50 and Article 42 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;