1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: the part concerning the 3th judgment of the court of first instance, the 4th to the 4th judgment of the court of first instance, and the 2th judgment of the court.

In addition, “see the statement of calculation of the amount in arrears” in Section 9 of Section 4, “However, with respect to F, the main holiday on the basis of the statement of calculation of the amount in arrears, January 18, 201, January 3, 2012, January 34, 2012, January 2, 2013, February 2, 2013, and February 9, 2013,” and the Defendant’s assertion on the following 4th page 2.

This is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition of the judgment stated in the paragraph, and thus, this is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Parts to be removed or added;

(a) The garded part of garlment garlment, Eul 7 through 12 (including the garlment number; hereinafter the same shall apply);

The testimony of the Plaintiff, etc. and the Defendant’s employer-employee relationship between the Plaintiff, etc. and the Defendant (hereinafter “Tsung Electronic”) is solely based on each of the statements and the witness H and I’s testimony.

It is insufficient to recognize that the cleaning service contract is terminated naturally according to the termination of the cleaning service contract between the division, or that the defendant has notified the plaintiff et al. of such circumstances, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge

Rather, according to the overall purport of evidence No. 3, the defendant did not report the loss of insurance against the plaintiff et al. even during the period of suspension of business, and the defendant did not report the loss of insurance against the plaintiff et al. <2> the defendant maintained the employment relationship with the plaintiff et al. when the plaintiff et al. terminated the period of suspension of business and the defect in the period of service that the plaintiff et al. would receive unemployment benefits for more than one year upon the expiration of the period of suspension of business. <3> The defendant et al. maintained the employment relationship with the plaintiff et al. as he et al. as he wanted the skilled human resources,