1. On October 31, 2012, the Defendant’s revocation of the designation of a public child care center against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

2...

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff is a person who operates the C Child Care Center (hereinafter “C Child Care Center”) in Jeju City B.

On December 15, 2009, the Defendant: (a) conducted an assessment and certification of child care facilities (term of validity: from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 201) with respect to the instant child care center; and (b) appointed the instant child care center as a public child care center on July 15, 201.

Around March 2009, D (E) who is a child of multicultural families admitted to the Child Care Center of this case and was absent from Korea from Vietnam for visit from September 1, 2009 to October 1, 2009. Although D was absent from Korea for September 1, 2009, the Plaintiff did not register the change to the “e-child care system” (current Child Care Integration System) even though D was absent for September 1, 2009.

On September 5, 2009, the Jeju Mayor paid the Plaintiff, who is the founder and operator of the instant childcare center, a basic childcare fee for September 2009, in proportion to the number of children of the instant childcare center that was electronically registered in the “e-education system” (current childcare integration system) as of September 5, 2009, pursuant to the Defendant’s “209 Infant Care Business Guidance Guidelines” (hereinafter “instant subsidies”), and the said subsidies included KRW 169,000 for the basic childcare fee for the portion of September 2009 against D (hereinafter “instant subsidies”). However, the Plaintiff did not return the instant subsidies to the Jeju Mayor.

On June 25, 2012, the Jeju City Mayor in charge of the disposition of the Jeju City and the revocation lawsuit therefor shall order the return of subsidies of KRW 1,023,90,00 in total, KRW 788,00 in September 7, 2009 and KRW 235,90 in total, KRW 70% in childcare fees for farmers and fishermen, and KRW 1,023,90 in total, which are 70% in childcare fees for farmers and fishermen registered as D under Article 40 of the Infant Care Act (Amended by Act No. 10789, Jun. 7, 201) on the grounds that the Plaintiff filed a false claim for subsidies against departing children from Korea.

On July 20, 2012, Jeju Mayor suspended the Plaintiff’s qualification for president on the same ground (the disposition taken from August 1, 2012 to August 31, 2012 and the suspension of the operation of child care centers are one month.