logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.09.03 2015고단541
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that A, an employee of the Defendant, operated B vehicle in violation of the limited weight around November 28, 2005, when he violated the Defendant’s duty.

2. Determination

A. The prosecutor prosecuted the above charged facts by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005).

B. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8314, Apr. 15, 2008; Act No. 9775, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 945, Mar. 19, 20194>

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow