1. The Defendants jointly and severally decide to the Plaintiff KRW 39,848,00,00 and the judgment of this case from April 22, 2010.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of 139 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). Defendant B is a building company, and Defendant Samdongsan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is the owner of 139 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). The Plaintiff is the owner of 139 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) around the instant land.

B. around July 2005, Defendant B entered into a contract for construction works on the basis, walls, windows, roof, toilets, etc. among new construction works on the instant land (hereinafter “instant housing”). Defendant B newly built the instant housing from July 2005 to January 2006, and was supplied with part of timber necessary for the structural construction from the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s cohabitant, and the structural construction completed the construction by giving up the E daily allowance introduced by the Plaintiff and giving up the construction work.

C. Meanwhile, from April 2008 to December 2009, the Defendant Company continued to blasting for the gathering of earth and stones from around 180 meters away from the instant house to around 180 meters, and at the time of blasting work as above, the amount of powder per one lot per blasting unit reaches the highest of 64 km.

At present, some of the basis of the instant house was invaded by the boundary of a neighboring state-owned river, and there are defects such as rupture and fall on the other day of the wall of the toilet, the number of the wall of the room, the removal of the wall of the room, the alteration of the wall of the room, the fluence of the wall of the room, the fluence of the wall of the wall of the outer wall, the vertical separation of the wall of the outer wall, the vertical separation of the outer wall, the rupture and math of the ceiling.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8 (including each number), video, witness E's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The occurrence and scope of liability for damages;

A. As a result of the appraisal of the evidence and appraiser F’s defects prior to the occurrence of liability for damages, the result of the appraiser G’s measurement and appraisal of the appraiser G, comprehensively taking account of the entire purport of the pleadings as a result of the on-site verification conducted by this court, the hanok-style building structure is a wall that can be cut off by the cutting and transformation of timber between 1 to 3 years after the construction of the building.