logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원영월지원 2020.01.22 2018가단232
전기요금 청구
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 111,028,490 for the Plaintiff and 15% per annum from January 30, 2018 to May 31, 2019.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. After entering into the first electric use contract around September 9, 192, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract on the electrical use of industrial power (B) and high voltageA (hereinafter “instant electric use contract”) around June 6, 2014. Accordingly, the Plaintiff supplied electricity to the Defendant’s business place producing tin, etc.

B. In order to normally measure the volume of electricity used by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff installs electric meters on the customer’s electric power system. The high-tension electric user directly installs the equipment “MOF” (hereinafter “MOF”) between his/her electric power system and the Plaintiff’s electric power system through the electric power business operator. The electricity of 22,90V supplied to the electric power system of the high-tension electric user was changed to the MOF and changed to the 110V to the electric power system of 10V or 190V, while entering the Plaintiff’s electric power system, and the volume of the electric power is calculated by measuring the volume of the changed electric power used by the consumers.

However, if the MOF facilities of the consumers occur, the accurate amount of electricity consumption and the amount of electricity can not be calculated.

C. On July 12, 2017, the Plaintiff discovered that there was an error in connection with the electric lines B, which connect the MOF and the electric power system, as a result of the round-up inspection on the electric meters installed at the Defendant’s factory and the MOF facilities.

Examining the details of remote inspection of the Plaintiff’s electric meters of power generation, the decision began on March 19, 2015 for the first time on March 13:06, and the decision continued until July 13:04, 2017, on which the Defendant replaced the MOF equipment.

The relevant provisions of the Plaintiff’s basic terms and conditions of supply (hereinafter “instant terms and conditions”) and the detailed rules of implementation are as follows.

Article 6 (Definitions of Terms and Conditions) The definitions of terms and conditions used in this Terms and Conditions shall be as follows:

(a) No. 10. The maximum demand power shall be measured in the power meter capable of measuring the maximum demand power.

arrow