1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is all dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be assessed against the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 6, 2011, I filed an application for a building permit with the head of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, for the construction of multi-household houses (hereinafter “instant building”) on the ground of the instant land as the owner of the land J, K, and L (hereinafter “instant land”) in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Incheon, and the instant land was merged with JJ land.

B. On April 12, 201, the head of Bupyeong-gu rendered a building permit on the instant building by imposing the following conditions according to the results of the deliberation by the 17th Sick Team in the Army located within the jurisdiction of the fleet’s mooring.

1. Prohibition on installation of similar lights which interfere with or might interfere with the identification of aeronautical lighting aids;

2. Prohibition of smoking or steam emission, color glass, or other reflecting display, which is likely to cause flying obstruction.

3. All windows installed at a new building shall be installed as windows among two;

4. Prohibition of civil petition related to aircraft noise.

5. Succession to the contents of the condition at the time of resale of land and buildings / Liability of the seller at the time of succession.

6. The implementation of the project after the submission of a note of performance at the time of acceptance of the above terms and conditions (including matters prohibited from filing civil petitions related to noise);

C. I submitted a letter of performance to comply with the above construction permit condition, and accordingly, the windows of the instant building were constructed in duplicate.

The Defendant concluded a sales contract for the instant land with I on January 21, 201, and completed the registration of ownership transfer based on the said sales contract on April 14, 201. Upon completion of a multi-household house on the instant land, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 2, 201.

E. On August 201, the Plaintiff and the rest of the designated parties indicated in the list of the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) concluded a sales contract with the Defendant for each household of the instant building (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) and commenced occupancy from around that time.

[Reasons for Recognition] contain facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12 below.