logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.05.27 2013고단3258
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 21, 2013, at around 21:00, the Defendant, at one “Dju shop” operated by the Defendant in Gwangju-si, called “Dju” and “the victim E (29 years of age) who is an employee and the Defendant under the influence of alcohol, was frighted to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to the

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and inflicted injury on the right side side of the victim, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Application of a certificate of injury, certificate of medical record, certificate of copy of damage photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. against Criminal Crimes, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of bodily injury while carrying a deadly weapon);

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation, the Defendant and the defense counsel denied the charges by asserting that the F, who was present at the time of the instant case, was the Defendant and the victim and F, were faced with beer diseases on the wall of the side where the Defendant was f, and that the beer disease was broken, and that the victim was injured by protruding, while the beer disease was broken.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence revealed earlier, i.e., ① the victim stated in the investigative agency to be consistent from the investigative agency to the court that the victim suffered bodily injury due to tearing the victim's head by beer disease, and the victim already agreed with the defendant at the prosecutor's investigation stage.

arrow