logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.11.28 2019고정252
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The Defendant is the issuer of “B” in the facts charged, and the victim D is the former Si Council member(Cparty E) and the chairman of the former F organization(F organization).

1. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection;

A. On December 1, 2018, between 10:34 and 10:49 on the same day, the Defendant sent a letter to the G organization or reading room with 222 persons, such as the representative of a press company, stating, “The prime distance of the D (victim)” refers to the name filled by the chairman of the public hall that is composed of novels, but (a) the F organization operated by the joint representative (victim) has secured the materials for viewing subsidies by mistake of subsidies.” “F organization operated by the joint representative (victim) has been informed of illegal behavior in the F organization (F organization),” and “F organization (F organization), who was aware of the fact that he had been reported of the illegal behavior in the F organization (F organization).”

However, in fact, there was no erroneous payment of subsidies by the F organization in which the defendant held office as the president.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

B. On January 21, 2019, at around 13:19, the Defendant accused of D (victim) on the H Internet bulletin board, in which C Party Members are affiliated. He received contact with Franchising investigation, and added up the franchis to D’s franchis, among his fating fatings, among his fating fatings of subsidies from civic groups (basts) D, I told D’s fating and fating the fats to the fats of D’s fats in the court of this case (basts).”

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of slandering, damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging facts openly through the information and communication network.

2. The Defendant of defamation, around December 27, 2018, listened to the large amount of party members, including N,O, P, and Q, before the 1st floor M in the Gu-U.S., where approximately 200 members of the C Party J Committee of the C Party (hereinafter “C Party JJ Committee”), attend the meeting of approximately 19:50 members of the C Party.

arrow