1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From March 21, 2017, the above real estate.

Attached Form

The facts stated in the cause of the claim do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate listed in the attached list to the plaintiff and pay the plaintiff the rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent of KRW 2,00,000 per month from March 21, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the above real estate, starting from March 21, 2017.

In response, the defendant argued that the defendant could not respond to the plaintiff's claim of this case because the defendant would pay the overdue rent if it is good under the circumstances in the reply submitted on August 17, 2017. However, if the defendant did not submit any data showing that the overdue rent was paid until the date of closing the argument of this case, the above argument of the defendant is without merit without any need to further examine the remaining points.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.