1. Of the judgment of the first instance, KRW 16,301,200 against the Plaintiff as to the Defendant and its related thereto, from July 19, 2012 to November 5, 2015.

1. Of the Plaintiff’s claim, the first instance court accepted only part of KRW 66,301,200 as to the first machinery of this case, and dismissed the remainder.

The scope of the trial of this court is limited to the claim of the above 66,301,200 won, as only the defendant appealed against the part against him.

2. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is one of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(a) and (b)

Since it is the same as the statement in the paragraph, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 19, and 20, and evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, 19, and 20, the parties to the agreement of this case did not dispute between the parties to the settlement obligation of this case and the parties to the settlement obligation of this case, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to return the money remaining after deducting the balance of the lease fees paid by the defendant from the proceeds of the sale of the machinery No. 1 of this case and the expenses incurred by the defendant's succession to the lease contract. 2) The parties' assertion that the plaintiff should return the money remaining after deducting the balance of the lease deposit paid by the plaintiff from the sum of the proceeds of the sale of the machinery No. 1 of this case and the lease fees paid by the plaintiff from the sum of the proceeds of the sale of the machinery No. 5,000,000,000 won paid by the plaintiff to the plaintiff.