Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 3, 2015, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness in the Seoul Central District Court Order 317, the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court Order 317, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) against E, 2015 High Court Order 2358, 2358.

The Defendant asked the defense counsel “(E) that “I would not get the head of F with beer disease on the spot where I am seated around January 29, 2015, but rather f would have a beer f where I am her head toward the upper part of F head.”

The answer to "," and the defense counsel's "not clearly able to take three heads, but to take the head behind the head."

Then, the defense counsel asked “I” to answer “I”, “I am the head of the Defendant followed, and asked “I am the head of the Defendant followed, and am the beer and beer, who was faced with the head of the F, and the head of the F, was faced with her disease or beer.”

The prosecutor confirmed that “A witness who was asked by the defendant clearly at this time that the defendant does not have to get a beer and beer disease towards F,” and the defendant respondeded to “for example.”

However, in fact, E was able to get the head of F three times with beer disease at the time and place of the above case, and due to which F was injured by the head of F.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory as above and issued perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. Copies of the police statements made to G and F;

1. Copy of a record of examination of a witness A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of an injury diagnosis;

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a selective fine (the defendant is the primary offender, and the perjury of the defendant does not affect the existence of the relevant defendant's case or the judgment of sentencing).