Text
1.(a)
Attached Form
The real estate listed in the list 1 shall be put to an auction and the proceeds shall be deducted from the auction cost.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The relevant Defendant B is the spouse of the deceased J (hereinafter “the deceased”) and the Plaintiff, Defendant C, D, E, F, and G are the children of the deceased.
B. The deceased is in possession of each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1) The deceased is in possession of each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 (hereinafter “real estate 1”).
ownership of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 from April 15, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as “second real estate”)
(2) On May 24, 2001, the heir (hereinafter “heirs”) except the Plaintiff and Defendant HH (hereinafter “Defendant H”) inherited on May 24, 2001 the deceased’s shares among the first and second real estate by consultation and division, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 27, 200.
3. On January 7, 2016, the Plaintiff donated 2/14 of its shares in real estate No. 1 and 2/28 of its shares in real estate No. 2/14 and the Defendant’s shares in real estate No. 2, and the same year.
2. As regards the second real estate, 19. As regards the same year:
3.4. Each registration of ownership transfer for the first real estate shall be completed.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including each number in the case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim
A. According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff, Defendant B, F, G, and Defendant door-gu owned 2/14 shares of each of the first real estate and 2/28 shares of each of the second real estate; Defendant C and E owned 1/14 shares of each of the first real estate and 1/28 shares of each of the second real estate; Defendant D owned 2/14 shares of each of the second real estate and 1/28 shares of each of the second real estate; and Defendant D owned 2/14 shares of each of the second real estate and 16/28 shares of each of the second real estate. The agreement on the method of dividing each of the real estate between the Plaintiff and the Defendants was not reached by the date of closing argument of this case. Accordingly, the Plaintiff, co-owner of each of the above real estate, as co-owner, may file a claim for