logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.07.13 2017구단2267
요양일부불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 28, 2016, the Plaintiff, who works as a street cleaners in the South Peace Prize Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Co., Ltd.”), was diagnosed as “Pastm escape certificate No. 4-5 (hereinafter “the instant accident”), and the relevant hospital received a diagnosis of “Pastm escape certificate No. 4-5 (hereinafter “the instant accident”),” while organizing the boxes.

B. On May 25, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits by asserting that it constitutes an occupational accident. On June 8, 2016, the Plaintiff received a decision from the Defendant that “The Plaintiff’s application for medical care is approved, and the explosion escape certificate (No. 4-5) cannot be recognized as an occupational accident, which is provided for in the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.” (hereinafter “the instant disposition is limited to the non-approved portion).” (C) On September 6, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a request with the Defendant on September 24, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a request from the Defendant for examination from the Defendant on October 24, 2016, that “The Plaintiff’s opinion of acute escape from external changes due to the age increase between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s video data data need to be observed, and that proximate causal causal relation between the instant accident and the instant injury cannot be acknowledged when it is found that the causal causal relation between the instant injury and the instant injury.

‘The decision of dismissal was made on the basis of the results of the Industrial Accident Review Committee.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 7 and 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the non-party company had repeatedly sought a leave from the non-party company as a street cleaners dealing with heavy objects for about five years.

The defendant, the defendant, and the defendant

In the case of this case where the injury and disease of this case has deteriorated due to the accident of this case while performing duties in the form of work, the injury and disease of this case have been accumulated in the vertebrate of the Yewal.

arrow