1. The plaintiffs' claims against each of the Defendants listed in the separate sheet 2 of the plaintiffs are dismissed in entirety.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs stated in the “Defendant” column corresponding to each of the Plaintiffs as indicated in the separate sheet 2 list “Plaintiff” is a person who joined the Defendants as a credit card member and received a credit card from the Defendants, and the Defendants are credit card companies engaged in the credit card business.

B. If Party B, C, D, and E (hereinafter “A”)’s officers and employees (hereinafter “B, etc.”) entrusted the management of the victims including the Plaintiffs to the company “F (hereinafter “F”) by purchasing 7,700,000 won of a tin photographer (hereinafter “A”) in the instant case, namely, a tin photographer” (hereinafter “F”), the F would lease the tin photographer at the front of the school, and would receive rent from the buyer. Since the 36-month rental profit is considerably good, the F would have received revenue from KRW 70,00 won for 10% each month, and after the expiration of the term of lease, the 10% of the sales proceeds would have been returned to the company, 25,200 won as principal and revenue, and the sale proceeds would have been guaranteed by the Plaintiffs, including the Plaintiffs, from 251 to 284, 205, 2015.

However, during the above period, i.e., e., arrology fire manufactured and installed in the upper spots, etc. was only 200 pacters, and from December 2013, i.e., i., e., the manufacture and lease of tinology fire was almost not performed. The operators of A had no intention to sell the tinology fire to buyers or to use the proceeds of sale, and there was no intention or ability to properly refund the principal and interest of the buyers with the proceeds of the lease.

C. The Plaintiffs are as above.