beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is the representative of the insurance corporation C, and the victim D calls the Defendant for the insurance contract with the Defendant, and the victim D calls the Defendant, and became a vision for the change of the policyholder, and became a director F, D, and E of the insurance corporation A and the insurance company’s director at the time of Jinan-dong, Jinan-dong.
On March 10, 2014, around 19:35, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant at one time, on his hand, on the ground that the former victim D(the age of 41) expressed his desire to read “Chewingly” in telephone, and that he she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she.
2. In a judgment, the burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial lies with the prosecutor, and the finding of guilt must be based on the evidence with probative value sufficient to cause a judge to have a reasonable doubt that the facts charged are true, so long as there is no room for a reasonable doubt, the suspicion of guilt against the defendant even if there is no such evidence.
Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.
The Defendant alleged that he was fluored with the lower part of the lower part of the Defendant’s body in order to restrain D from harming himself on the day of the instant case. However, the Defendant alleged that he did not assault D at the time of her scam. As such, D’s investigation agency and court statement, the only evidence consistent with the facts charged, which correspond to the facts charged, stated that, even though the summary order of KRW 700,00,00,00 was finalized, the Defendant and two male persons together with the Defendant stated to the effect that he would go beyond it, and that he would go against the Defendant when he and the Defendant were aware of the fact that he she scam, even though the summary order of KRW 70,00,00,000 was finalized, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant’s left part of the Defendant’s hand at the scene of the accident, and that, thereafter, F did not use the scam to take the cell phone image with scam.