logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.16 2017나73280
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s ground of appeal cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the assertion in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows the evidence submitted to the court, the fact finding and judgment in the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate (it is difficult to find that the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone was “the fire occurred in the product of this case, and the fire occurred in the above product,” and since 25 days or more from the date the Defendants installed the product of this case, the fire of this case occurred after the lapse of 25 days from the date of the construction of the product of this case, and there was a large amount of 240 meters in the echeon area where the warehouse building of this case was located before and after the point of time of the occurrence of the fire of this case, even if the first fire occurred in the product of this case, as alleged by the Plaintiff, it seems that the fire of this case was caused not by the defect of the product of this case, but by an electric leakage under water leakage as well as by the judgment of this case]

2. The decision of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow