A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of occupational embezzlement, etc. at Daejeon District Court on November 21, 2012, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on the 29th of the same month and is currently

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant was working as a field agent at C, who had been working for the packing construction of access roads to the inside agro-industrial complex from January 2013 to June 201.

1. Around 18:00 on January 24, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, the owner of the pertinent industrial company, within the F office located in Seoan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, North Korea, that “The head of the public office of C, the contractor, who will engage in the construction of the access road to the inside agro-industrial complex. When the design is completed, the payment for completed portion will be used as operating funds, and shall be repaid.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he thought that he will use it for his personal obligation, living expenses, etc., and did not have any intent to use it as the company's operating fund and did not have any ability to repay the borrowed money.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1 million from the victim to the personal compromise account (G) in the name of the defendant, and acquired the money by transfer of KRW 14 million through eight times in total as shown in the annexed crime list, such as in the annexed crime list.

2. Around January 4, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim H, the representative of the subcontractor company, within the C office located in the Da Office located in the Dabuan-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, the victim H, stating, “I would make a payment upon loan of money with the price for Amcon, and I would have made an advance payment that would be made upon request.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he thought that he will use the money for his personal obligation, living expenses, etc., and did not have any intention to use the money as the price, and did not have any ability to repay the money.