logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.26 2017고단6060
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 30, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.140% among blood transfusions, the Defendant driven a coo car in the section C of approximately approximately 200 meters from the front of the mutual influence restaurant located in the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu Officero to the middle of the Crostro in the area of about 200 meters from the day on which the Defendant driven a coo car in the section C of approximately 200 meters from the day on which the coo is located

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the circumstances of the driver at home and the situation of the driver at home;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order to Attend a lecture is that the defendant once a person has been punished for driving under drinking alcohol, once a person without a license, and once a person has again driven under drinking alcohol; the defendant was found to have been found to have violated the signal during driving under drinking; the public official was investigated by the police despite being a public official and appears to have falsely stated his occupation to be fishing (fishing control) as a fishing (fishing control). In light of the various circumstances mentioned above, the fact that the defendant has to severely punish the defendant despite his disadvantage in the status he will suffer, etc. is against the disadvantage that the defendant would suffer; the fact that the defendant has no history exceeding the fine; the fact that the driving distance is not long; considering the favorable circumstances, the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence as the order shall be determined as

arrow