Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) from the stairs between C3 and the fourth floor located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul on March 21, 2018, the Defendant laid down the victim D (40 years old) who was the general director of the above public announcement unit, and the salted thing (20cm in length) being a dangerous thing being used in the majudo hand, which had not been good for the Defendant to demand the leaving room before that time; and (b) laid down the victim’s blick with the blick, and laid down the victim’s blick with the blick in the vicinity of the said blick.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of a crime (influence), investigation report (influent change of name of the crime), investigation report (in the form of the salted fish of this case)

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that although there was the date and time stated in the facts charged, the defendant laid down plastic brooms on the floor at the place, the defendant did not say that the victim's booms as the victim's booms, or that the salted salted so as to be cut down immediately if the victim's b

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the victim, at the investigative agency and this court, said that the Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, stated the salted fish at the date and place, and stated the Defendant in this court, stated that the victim was able to see that the victim was immediately hicked by this hinging with the hing of the victim (victim).

As stated, if the statement did not actually experience, it includes the contents that it is impossible to make a statement (or, at the time of the case, the location of the defendant or the victim, the circumstances in which the defendant possessed the salted fish at the time of the case, and the salted fish village at the time of the defendant.