A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 22, 2017, the Defendant driving a CKa car without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the “Arom-mar Jeju Apartment”-ro No. 38-ro 14:00 on August 14:0, 2017 to the front side of the “Amrom-ro”-No. 759-ro No. 759-ro, Simpo City.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car with C in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (or after an accident).

On August 22, 2017, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle around 14:10 and driving the said vehicle along a three-lane in the direction of the Tyang inspection station, along the road of 761-2, Young-gu, Sinpo City, 761-2, the front side of the Foldong apartment, which led to the intersection in front of the E-cafeteria located in Sinpo City D, while driving the road along the three-lane in the direction of the Tyang inspection station.

Since there is a long distance intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents with other motor vehicles by performing the duty of vision and complying with the vehicle signal and passing through the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and entered the intersection as it is, due to the negligence of entering the intersection while the electric signal was red, followed by the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle from the width of the center line to the right-hand side, and shocked by the victim F. (35 years old) driving by the left-hand turn.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt ties and tensions in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, destroyed the victim’s frighting car, which is the victim’s ownership, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1..