logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.12.07 2017나2007
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the claim for damages is governed by the first instance judgment.

In addition to the appeal as follows, the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance.

『다. 책임의 제한 다만 원고가 당시 술에 만취하여 오토바이를 운전하다가 중앙분리대를 충격한 후 쓰러져 있었던 점, 피고 차량으로서는 중앙분리대가 설치된 도로의 1차로에 사람이 쓰러져 있으리라고 예상하기 어려운 점, 당시는 야간이고 가로등도 없어서 원고를 쉽게 발견하기 어려웠을 것으로 보이는 점, 한편 피고 차량을 선행하던 차량은 오토바이 사고를 목격하고 비상등을 켠 채 2차로에 정차하고 있었으므로, 피고 차량으로서는 사고 발생 가능성을 염두에 두면서 서행하는 등으로 좀 더 주의를 기울여 운행하였어야 하나 그렇게 하지 않은 점을 비롯한 이 사건 사고의 경위와 사고 도로의 여건 등을 참작하여 피고의 책임을 전체 손해액의 40%로 제한한다.』

2. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the scope of liability for damages is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to partial dismissal as follows. Therefore, this is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) Attacheds to the judgment of the first instance shall be changed to that attached to this judgment.

② Deduction 7) of the judgment of the first instance court is as follows. 7) Mutual aid (7) : (A) Of the medical expenses paid by the Defendant to the Defendant in accordance with the attached table of calculation of damages ("Deduction") 72,320,450, the portion of the Plaintiff's negligence out of the 1,614,000 won paid by the Defendant for the repair cost of the Defendant's vehicle due to the instant accident (C) 4,360,670 won [3] 4,360 won [320,450 won 1,614,000 won] 60%] of the judgment of the first instance court (3) 70% of the judgment of the first instance court.

arrow