1. On October 30, 2018, the Plaintiff’s claim for revocation of the return of the application for permission for construction to the head of Pyeongtaek-si.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s application for construction permit 1) The Plaintiff is called Pyeongtaek-si (hereinafter “Bri”) around 2017.

() C) 2,615 square meters, D 1,025 square meters, E 3,914 square meters, F 6,155 square meters, and 4 square meters (the land of the above 4 lots is in the same shape as the land of the same parcel, which is adjacent to the order of the above 2,615 square meters, from the Dong to the Dong, in the case of the land of the above 4 lots.

hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant applications”

(2) On June 28, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application with the head of Pyeongtaek-si for permission to construct a 4-dong 2,919.82 square meters on the above F land (hereinafter “instant application site”). On August 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application with the head of Pyeongtaek-si for permission to construct a milch livestock shed with the content of newly constructing a 4-dong 2,919.82 square meters on the above F land (hereinafter “instant application site”) and filed an application for permission to engage in development activities for the creation of a livestock shed (land form and quality alteration) on the instant application site as a complex complex.

(3) On July 10, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for building permit including the above development permit (hereinafter “instant application 1”) with the head of Pyeongtaek-si for the said C, D, and E’s three lots of land (hereinafter “instant application 2”).

(2) Around August 2017, a person filed an application for a building permit to newly build 2 1,185.9 square meters of milch livestock pens on the ground. Around August 2017, a person filed an application for a building permit to engage in development activities for the creation of livestock pens sites (land form and quality change) with respect to three lots of land in C, D, and E (hereinafter referred to as “application for construction permit of this case”).

b. (1) Defendant Pyeongtaek-si Head had deliberated on the application Nos. 1 and 2 of this case by the Urban Planning Committee, including the result of deliberation by the Urban Planning Committee.

Re-deliberation - Submission of data on environmental pollution reduction measures (preventive facilities) - Implementation of consultation with Griri residents and neighboring enterprises 2) on December 15, 2017, which was held on December 15, 2017, the 23th city planning (the subcommittee and the Committee decided the Plaintiff’s 1 and 2 applications of this case as follows:

Conditional acceptance - The last excellent manle 1200m wide - two sites.