logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.01.22 2019고단4954
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 1, 2008, the defendant was issued a summary order of one million won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court.

On November 19, 2019, at around 23:35, the Defendant driven an EM car with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration 0.043% under the influence of alcohol on the roads near Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the front road of the building in Gwangju-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous conviction: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of inquiry letter and a copy of summary order;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that although the defendant was punished by a fine of one million won for driving under the influence of alcohol in 2005 and 2008, he/she is not liable for driving under the influence of alcohol again. However, there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine; the record of the above punishment is about 11 years; the interval between the time between the above punishment and the crime of this case is about 11 years; the blood alcohol concentration (0.04%) is low and the blood alcohol concentration (50 meters) is relatively short; and other sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and conditions after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered.

arrow