Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 15, 2016, at the convenience store located in Daegu Northern-gu B around 03:44, the Defendant: (a) received a monthly emergency labelling report from the Defendant’s employees and received questions about personal information from E from the police officers belonging to the D District Unit, and sent to E, and sent to E, “I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of each police statement with respect to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of processing reported case 112;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which was reported by the Defendant, committed an assault against the police officer called out upon receipt of a report by the Defendant, but the police officer E was investigated by the police, and there is no place where the police officer’s investigation was conducted and it does not directly comply with the investigation.

“The Defendant made a statement to the effect that the degree of assault committed by the Defendant was not serious, and damage was not likely to occur, and the Defendant is not subject to any other criminal punishment except for punishment once a fine due to driving under drinking, etc., the conditions for sentencing favorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the conditions for sentencing favorable to the Defendant, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct