1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant B, P, M, N, andO are annexed to Q 1/2 shares in the real estate listed in Attached Table 1 List 1.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as to the cause of the claim, ① The real estate listed in the annexed Table No. 1 List No. 1 was owned by S. S. on September 11, 1989, and the registration of the right to claim the transfer of ownership listed in the annexed Table No. 1 List No. 1's paragraph (1) was completed in Q and R on the same day on September 11, 1989, and the plaintiff and T purchased each of the above real estate 1/2 shares on October 17, 2011 and completed the registration of transfer; ② The real estate listed in the annexed Table No. 1 List No. 2 is U.S. ownership, and U.S. owned the ownership transfer registration listed in the annexed Table No. 1 List No. 1 (b) in Q and R; the transfer registration of ownership was completed on September 11, 1989 in Q and R; and thereafter, the plaintiff and the above right holder of the above real property were deceased No. 1/21/2.

According to the above facts, the provisional registration of each right to claim for transfer registration of ownership listed in paragraph (1) of the order of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 on September 11, 1989 was made on the basis of a pre-sale contract, and the right to conclude the purchase and sale contract terminated by the lapse of the exclusion period on September 11, 1999 after ten years have passed from that date. The plaintiff who is a 1/2 right holder of each of the above real estate as co-owned land preservation act can seek cancellation of each right to claim transfer registration against the defendants alone.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and all of the claims are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.